BenRoudenis.com

Read Erik Verlinde ‘s paper “On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton,” where he explains gravity as an entropic force.  Here is the abstract:

Starting from first principles and general assumptions Newton’s law of gravitation is shown to arise naturally and unavoidably in a theory in which space is emergent through a holographic scenario. Gravity is explained as an entropic force caused by changes in the information associated with the positions of material bodies. A relativistic generalization of the presented arguments directly leads to the Einstein equations. When space is emergent even Newton’s law of inertia needs to be explained. The equivalence principle leads us to conclude that it is actually this law of inertia whose origin is entropic.

On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton [arxiv.org]

Read the full paper here:

On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton (pdf)
Author: Erik Verlinde

Researchers knew that the information carried in light pulses could be transferred to clouds of ultracold atoms, called Bose-Einstein condensates. In this technique, a laser called a control laser prepares the atomic cloud for an incoming light beam. As the photons fly in, they leave an imprint in a subset of the atoms. This imprint, stored in a quantum property known as spin, contains all the relevant information needed to reconstitute the light beam. But the imprint is fragile and deteriorates in milliseconds. The light’s information is lost as other atoms in the cloud interfere with the imprint.

Lene Hau of Harvard University and colleagues overcame this problem by sequestering the matter imprint from the rest of the atoms in the cloud. The team shone a pulse of laser light — which looks like the yellow light from street lamps, Hau says — into a small cloud of sodium atoms. A three-microsecond pulse produced a stretch of light about a kilometer long, but as the pulse entered the atom cloud, it began to compress. Like an accordion closing, the light folded up and crammed itself into a space just 0.02 millimeters long. The spin states of the sodium atoms in the light’s path were changed, forming the matter imprint. By turning off the control laser, the researchers were able to freeze the matter imprint.

Next, the researchers strengthened the magnetic field applied to the atom cloud to protect the imprint from interfering atoms. At a certain magnetic field, Hau says, interactions between the imprint and the rest of the atoms start to become repulsive, and the imprint separates from the cloud like a drop of oil in water. “This matter imprint digs a little hole for itself in the condensate,” Hau says. “It can snugly sit there for long periods of time.”

After waiting 1.5 seconds, the team revived the light beam. First, the researchers coaxed the matter imprint to the outside of the cloud by changing the magnetic field, and then they turned the control laser back on. The light beam that emerged from the atom cloud was weaker than the light beam that went in but similar in other regards, such as frequency and polarization, Hau says. Improving the stability of the magnetic field will likely lead to longer storage times, she adds.

Frozen light stays fresh longer [ScienceNews]

Using a few ultracold ions, intense lasers and some electrodes, researchers have built the first programmable quantum computer. The new system, described in a paper to be published in Nature Physics, flexed its versatility by performing 160 randomly chosen processing routines.

Earlier versions of quantum computers have been largely restricted to a narrow window of specific tasks. To be more generally useful, a quantum computer should be programmable, in the same way that a classical computer must be able to run many different programs on a single piece of machinery.

. . . . .

Researchers led by David Hanneke of the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder, Colo., based their quantum computer on two beryllium ions chilled to just above absolute zero. These ions, trapped by an  electromagnetic field on a gold-plated alumina chip, formed the quantum bits, or qubits, analogous to the bits in regular computers represented by 0s and 1s. Short laser bursts manipulated the beryllium ions to perform the processing operations, while nearby magnesium ions kept the beryllium ions cool and still.

Hanneke and colleagues chose 160 programs for the quantum computer to run. “We picked them, quite literally, at random,” Hanneke says. “We really wanted to sample all possible operations.”

The researchers ran each program 900 times. On average, the quantum computer operated accurately 79 percent of the time, the team reported in their paper, which was published online November 15. “Getting this kind of control over a quantum system is really interesting from a physics perspective,” Hanneke says.

First programmable quantum computer created [ScienceNews]

Today the LHC circulated two beams simultaneously for the first time, allowing the operators to test the synchronization of the beams and giving the experiments their first chance to look for proton-proton collisions. With just one bunch of particles circulating in each direction, the beams can be made to cross in up to two places in the ring. From early in the afternoon, the beams were made to cross at points 1 and 5, home to the ATLAS and CMS detectors, both of which were on the look out for collisions. Later, beams crossed at points 2 and 8, ALICE and LHCb.

. . . . .

Beams were first tuned to produce collisions in the ATLAS detector, which recorded its first candidate for collisions at 14:22 this afternoon. Later, the beams were optimised for CMS. In the evening, ALICE had the first optimization, followed by LHCb.

. . . . .

These developments come just three days after the LHC restart, demonstrating the excellent performance of the beam control system. Since the start-up, the operators have been circulating beams around the ring alternately in one direction and then the other at the injection energy of 450 GeV. The beam lifetime has gradually been increased to 10 hours, and today beams have been circulating simultaneously in both directions, still at the injection energy.

Two circulating beams bring first collisions in the LHC [CERN Press Releases]

A pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have suggested that the hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to produce with the collider, might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation would ripple backward through time and stop the collider before it could make one, like a time traveler who goes back in time to kill his grandfather.

Holger Bech Nielsen, of the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, and Masao Ninomiya of the Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics in Kyoto, Japan, put this idea forward in a series of papers with titles like “Test of Effect From Future in Large Hadron Collider: a Proposal” and “Search for Future Influence From LHC,” posted on the physics Web site arXiv.org in the last year and a half.

According to the so-called Standard Model that rules almost all physics, the Higgs is responsible for imbuing other elementary particles with mass.

“It must be our prediction that all Higgs producing machines shall have bad luck,” Dr. Nielsen said in an e-mail message. In an unpublished essay, Dr. Nielson said of the theory, “Well, one could even almost say that we have a model for God.” It is their guess, he went on, “that He rather hates Higgs particles, and attempts to avoid them.”

This malign influence from the future, they argue, could explain why the United States Superconducting Supercollider, also designed to find the Higgs, was canceled in 1993 after billions of dollars had already been spent, an event so unlikely that Dr. Nielsen calls it an “anti-miracle.”

The Collider, the Particle and a Theory About Fate [The New York Times]

If you’re a real physics buff like me, follow these links to the actual papers:

Search for Effect of Influence from Future in Large Hadron Collider (pdf)
Authors: Holger B. Nielsen, Masao Ninomiya

Test of Influence from Future in Large Hadron Collider; A Proposal (pdf)
Authors: Holger B. Nielsen, Masao Ninomiya